Analysis on the need to balancing quantitative and qualitative targets for sustainability
- Sylvain Richer de Forges
- May 11
- 2 min read
Balancing Quantitative and Qualitative Targets in Corporate Sustainability

When building a corporate sustainability strategy, there’s a tendency to focus heavily on quantitative targets—reducing carbon emissions by X%, achieving net zero by Y year, or committing Z dollars to renewable energy. While these metrics are essential for measuring progress, relying solely on numbers can lead to a narrow view of success.
Equally important are qualitative targets, which focus on cultural shifts, stakeholder engagement, and long-term value creation. These intangible factors drive the systemic changes required for sustainability to succeed. Together, quantitative and qualitative targets create a comprehensive and impactful strategy.
For example:
A CDP study (2023) found that companies combining quantitative climate targets (e.g., reducing Scope 1 and 2 emissions by a specific percentage) with qualitative goals like improving board-level climate competency outperformed peers on ESG ratings by 15% on average.
Research by McKinsey & Company (2021) highlighted that organizations embedding qualitative targets—such as fostering a sustainability-driven culture—realize a 21% higher probability of achieving their quantitative goals.
Moreover, Harvard Business Review (2020) emphasized that intangible goals, such as improving employee engagement in sustainability initiatives, are critical to aligning corporate values with strategy, which can boost organizational performance by 22%.
What Does This Look Like in Practice?
A well-rounded strategy might include:
Quantitative Targets: Reducing carbon emissions by 50% by 2030.
Qualitative Targets: Ensuring that employees understand their role in achieving climate goals through targeted training programs.
While numbers drive accountability, qualitative metrics ensure those numbers are grounded in meaningful, systemic change. Both are essential for navigating the complexity of sustainability challenges in a way that’s measurable yet adaptable.
How does your organization balance the measurable and the meaningful in sustainability? Let’s discuss what it takes to build strategies that last.
Comments